PDA

View Full Version : Spit IIa: Great offline; pooched online!



ATAG_Snapper
May-06-2012, 14:00
Note how online the Spitfire Mk IIa decreases in speed (IAS) at 5,000 and 10,000 feet at 2800 rpms, but offline it stays fast!!!

335th_GRAthos
May-06-2012, 16:27
Now were have seeing this before... Oh wait!

It was in IL2FB
:hugesmiley:


OK, OK, adding insult to injury is unfriendly, sorry!



Just that I understand correctly though, Blacksix had posted these graphs
Speed graphs for Spitfire and Hurricane
http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthread.php?t=31450
for the MK1a Spitfire and MK1a Hurricane.

Did they at least stay consistent with what they had announced?


~S~

ATAG_Snapper
May-06-2012, 16:41
THEY LIE! THEY LIE! :bgsmile:

Just kidding! My Spitfire tests end at 10,000 feet where theirs begins (3000 m). As for the Hurricane....I'm afraid it's become the Hurri-can't. :0:

There was a post over at 1C by Camber (a good guy) that was showing Spit IIa data for the new beta/alpha patch which honestly puzzled me. His numbers were far better than what I could achieve on ATAG. I was skeptical that online flight models would be different from offline flight models until I tried 'em for myself.

I certainly encourage anyone or everyone to try them too, especially full overboost at 2800 rpms. If I'm wrong, I'm wrong. I'll eat an entire all-dressed pizza in penance! :bgsmile:

Catseye
May-06-2012, 23:59
Now were have seeing this before... Oh wait!

It was in IL2FB
:hugesmiley:


OK, OK, adding insult to injury is unfriendly, sorry!



Just that I understand correctly though, Blacksix had posted these graphs
Speed graphs for Spitfire and Hurricane
http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthread.php?t=31450
for the MK1a Spitfire and MK1a Hurricane.

Did they at least stay consistent with what they had announced?


~S~

S! Guys,
I've tried the Spits and Hurricane offline and online and I can't get the online to equal offline. My figures are even less than Snapper's. Looking at the graph from B6, I'm convinced that not only is it incorrect, but unachievable in this Beta.