So anyway... I recently spotted a used TrackIR 5 on eBay with the pro clip IR led thingamy included for a very tempting price.
Glugg gluggg... “Click”
Now as many of you will know I have been using ED Tracker since this time last year and very happy I have been with it too.
I thought it might be useful to write up some of my observations which I hope will be useful to new players as well as to existing ones.
I’m writing this up as of the first attempt at using it so my opinion is likely to change as this article continues.
Also my observations are strictly limited to TrackIR and ED Tracker, I have no experience of other head tracking devices.
So without further ado... here are my thoughts:
Initial Setup
First up... I tried a few profiles I found on the forum ... Lewis... Karaya... KushViper.
None of those are for me... personally I really hate dead zones... I like the tracker to follow my head rather than act like a magnet to the front of the plane...
Linear response for me... It’s how I have always had the Ed Tracker set up... natural like !
So... initial stab at setting up my own profile, I went with Speed 1 Smoothing 20. With smoothing I was looking for maximum response with the ability to keep still when required. I can do this down to about 10 without any problem... but figured I’d give myself a bit of margin. 25 was too much. 20 seems ok.. might kick it down a bit later.
First Use
My initial thoughts.... Hmmmm
Bit alien to start off with. With the X and Y head movement (ie moving the head left and right or up and down while looking straight (something ED tracker does not do) ) I now have to keep the reticule light in the centre of the glass bit by moving my head back to were it was before I shifted in my seat / picked up the coffee, nudged my cat of the rudder pedals etc...
Just following a few planes in the safety-net of Leadfarm had me jockeying my head about trying to reline the crosshairs in the glass. I used the 'reset view' hotkey a lot to start with.... didn’t notice it quite as much by the end of the evening though so maybe I got used to it, also I fiddled a bit with the X Y and Z settings to get them a little more 1:1 rather than exaggerated...
It’s initially a little strange having this additional control after flying for so long without it.
It’s not like you have to retrain anything though (as was the case when I moved from twist stick to rudder pedals).
To start with I found it a lot easier to check 6 with the ED tracker... but probably because the lean out (in my ED tracker profile) is set such that it's automatic (the only way possible) so I’m only doing one thing, “turn head” rather than “turn and move head” ... that said now I can move the views left and right of the tail without turning the view round the other way. I doubt there is any advantage there its just an observation.
Checking six with Ed Tracker is simpler and I think just as effective. (NOTE: this does require Opentrack 2.2 Stable to be set up correctly or Ed Tracker wont "lean out" around the tail... see Lew's welcome post for details on how to do that, or check out my uploaded profile in the downloads section)
Checking six with Track IR did start to feel pretty normal within a couple of hours.
Basically... Either works
Oh.... the shake when zoomed in is way less than with ED Tracker. (though I did get that very good in my 2.2 stable Opentrack profile (see the downloads section). Track IR seems very good right out of the box on that front.
And keeping visuals on contacts is much easier without having to manoeuvre the plane as much... (which I guess must be a bit of an energy bleeder)... I can lean out and look down the sides of the engine... which helps, and I get a reasonable view over the sides so don’t need to roll the plane as much when looking below... I’m not sure there is masses in this... but it did seem a bit better.
Where the benefit of being able to move your head about in X Y and Z as well as pitch roll and yaw was immediately obvious was in the hurricane. All of a sudden I can shift my head and keep eyes on contacts that become obscured by the canopy “cage”. This isn't really a big issue in the Spitfire. But in the hurricane (which is my plane of choice it seems) it’s a huge improvement. I flew last night with the canopy shut for the first time without the feeling of being a little bit blind.
Value for money?
Well... yeah.... trickey one this. I don't know what your bank balance is or how frugal or spendthrift you are...
Mine is second hand as was £110 delivered with the pro clip as well as the hat thingy... so cheaper than new by a comfortable margin... but is still over £100 which is plenty of money-coins.
As of right now (a few test flights in... and no combat yet) if I was advising a new player with no kit... I would definitely say get ED Tracker. On cost it totally trumps Track IR
Don't get me wrong... Track IR is great, I can see me falling in love with it !
but it has also highlights just how damn good Ed Tracker is for the money.
At less than a third of the cost it's definitely better value.
Caveat: Pilot Officer Dix made his own version of Track IR on a budget so that approach might well be an avenue worth investigating
Having said the above I do think I’m unlikely to be switching back to ED Tracker (unless something goes badly wrong.... )
So to sum up at the end of my initial evening:
ED Tracker is way better value, Track IR is ‘more accomplished’ but the price tag is nuts.
I’m currently using Track IR and I’m liking it despite it's initial unfamiliarity.
Tune in next week when I will be asking: "So you said all that last week... but what about now ?"
Until then... keep em peeled !
'Seas
Bookmarks